Real Feedback From Businesses We've Helped

Honest experiences from companies working with our API streaming solutions in Vietnam

We don't ask clients to write glowing reviews. Instead, we reach out a few months after deployment and ask a simple question: "How's it actually going?" The responses below are from those conversations — unpolished, genuine, and sometimes brutally honest about what worked and what didn't.

Some projects went smoother than others. That's just how development works. But every client here saw real improvements in their streaming infrastructure, even when the path there had bumps.

We started using StreamOnApi in March 2025 for our educational platform. The integration took about three weeks, which was longer than we hoped but understandable given our legacy system. What surprised us most was how the team handled a critical bug we found during testing — they fixed it within hours, not days.

Linh Dao Thị

Technical Director, EduStream Vietnam

Honestly, I was skeptical at first. We'd tried two other streaming solutions before finding StreamOnApi in January 2025. The difference was in the documentation — it actually made sense to our junior developers. Our video buffering issues dropped significantly within the first month, though we still see occasional hiccups during peak hours.

Phương Nguyễn Văn

CTO, MediaHub Saigon

The API endpoints worked as advertised, which sounds like a low bar but you'd be surprised how rare that is. We deployed in February 2025 and have been monitoring performance closely. The support team responds quickly, and they don't pretend to know everything — when they need time to investigate, they just say so.

Tuấn Lê Minh

Lead Developer, ContentFlow Systems

We migrated from another provider in late 2024 and went live with StreamOnApi in January 2025. The migration had its challenges — mostly on our end — but their team walked us through each step. Our streaming costs decreased by about 30%, and video quality improved noticeably. Not perfect, but definitely better.

Hằng Trần Thị

Operations Manager, Digital Learning Hub

What I appreciate most is the straightforward pricing. No hidden fees that appear three months later. We've been using the service since April 2025, and the monthly costs have stayed consistent. The analytics dashboard gives us the data we need without overwhelming us with unnecessary metrics.

Bình Hoàng Văn

Product Manager, StreamTech Vietnam

Our users in rural areas were experiencing significant lag with our old setup. After switching to StreamOnApi in March 2025, we saw improvement but not the dramatic change we hoped for — turns out our CDN configuration needed work too. The team helped us identify that, which saved us months of troubleshooting.

Mai Vũ Thị

Engineering Lead, Provincial Education Network

Development team reviewing streaming performance metrics and API integration results

How These Results Actually Happened

The testimonials above didn't come from perfect implementations. They came from real projects with real challenges, where our team worked alongside clients to solve actual problems.

Take Linh's project at EduStream Vietnam. The three-week integration wasn't what either of us planned. Their legacy system had quirks nobody documented, and we spent days just understanding how their old streaming setup worked. But once we identified the core issues, we could build something that actually fit their needs.

Or Phương's experience at MediaHub Saigon. When he mentioned they'd tried two other solutions first, that wasn't a selling point — it was context. Some services oversell and underdeliver. We've learned that showing up consistently and fixing bugs quickly matters more than marketing promises.

What Actually Made the Difference

Response times measured in hours, not days, when critical issues appeared
Documentation written by developers who remembered being confused themselves
Honest conversations about limitations before they became problems
Support that admits when they need time to investigate rather than guessing

Our Review Collection Process

Client interview session documenting authentic feedback about API implementation experiences

1 Wait Three Months

We don't ask for reviews right after launch. New systems need time to reveal their true performance. Three months gives clients enough experience to know what actually works in production.

2 Ask Open Questions

Instead of "How satisfied are you?" we ask "What's been working?" and "What's still frustrating?" The goal is understanding, not marketing material. Sometimes the answers aren't what we want to hear, but they're always useful.

3 Keep It Honest

When clients share feedback, we publish it as written. If they mention problems that took time to solve, that stays in. Real experiences include challenges — pretending otherwise would be dishonest. You can read more about our methodology for handling client feedback.

Want to Share Your Experience?

If you're currently working with StreamOnApi, we'd genuinely like to hear how things are going. The good parts, the frustrating parts, and everything in between. Your feedback helps us improve and gives potential clients realistic expectations.

Share Your Feedback Back to Home